Why Did The Universe Begin?
In this episode of The Joy of Why, Thomas Hertog discusses his collaboration with Stephen Hawking on a provocative theory arguing that the laws of physics evolved with the universe, and how this could have shaped a cosmos fit for life. The post Why Did The Universe Begin? first appeared on Quanta Magazine

In the final years of his life, the legendary physicist Stephen Hawking collaborated with Thomas Hertog on a groundbreaking theory that challenges long-held assumptions about the origins of the universe. This provocative idea, which has been the subject of much discussion in the scientific community, suggests that the laws of physics did not remain static before the Big Bang but instead evolved alongside the universe itself. This theory, which has been termed "the evolving laws of physics," offers a fresh perspective on the question of why the universe began and how it could have developed into a cosmos that is not only habitable but also fine-tuned for life.
For decades, cosmologists have agreed that the universe had a beginning, marked by the Big Bang. However, the precise details surrounding this event remain shrouded in mystery. The traditional view, often referred to as the "theory of everything," posits that a unified set of physical laws governed the universe from its inception. This assumption has been a cornerstone of modern cosmology, but it has also led to unanswered questions about the initial conditions that gave rise to the universe we observe today.
Hawking and Hertog's theory proposes that the laws of physics were not fixed before the Big Bang but instead evolved as the universe expanded and evolved. This idea challenges the notion that the universe's fundamental laws were set in stone from the very beginning. Instead, the physicists argue that these laws were subject to change and adaptation, much like biological organisms evolve over time.
The theory hinges on the concept of a "landscape" of possible universes, each governed by different physical laws. In this multiverse scenario, the universe we inhabit is just one among countless others, each with its own unique set of laws. The idea is that the universe's laws were not predetermined but emerged through a process of selection, driven by the need to produce a cosmos that could support life.
Hawking and Hertog's work suggests that the universe's evolution was guided by a process of natural selection, where universes with laws that are more conducive to life are more likely to survive and produce offspring universes. This process would explain why our universe appears to be so finely tuned for life, as it would have been selected for its ability to sustain the conditions necessary for the emergence of life.
The theory also offers a potential solution to the "measure problem," a long-standing issue in cosmology that questions how to assign probabilities to different outcomes in the early universe. By positing that the laws of physics evolved over time, the theory provides a framework for understanding how the universe could have selected its own initial conditions, thereby resolving the measure problem.
However, the evolving laws of physics theory is not without its critics. Some scientists argue that it relies on speculative concepts, such as the existence of a multiverse, which have not yet been empirically verified. Others contend that the theory does not provide a clear mechanism for how the laws of physics could evolve, leaving key questions unanswered.
Despite these challenges, the work of Hawking and Hertog has sparked renewed interest in the question of the universe's origins and the nature of its fundamental laws. Their theory challenges the traditional view of a static set of physical laws and invites further exploration into the possibility that the universe's evolution was shaped by a dynamic interplay between its laws and its environment.
In the years since Hawking's passing, Thomas Hertog has continued to develop and refine the evolving laws of physics theory. His research has focused on exploring the implications of this idea for our understanding of the early universe, as well as its potential consequences for the search for life beyond Earth.
The theory of evolving laws of physics offers a compelling alternative to the traditional view of the universe's origins. By proposing that the laws of physics were not fixed but instead evolved alongside the universe, it provides a fresh perspective on the question of why the universe began and how it could have developed into a cosmos that is not only habitable but also fine-tuned for life. While the theory remains controversial and faces significant challenges, it has undeniably sparked new avenues of inquiry and debate within the field of cosmology.
In the end, the quest to understand the origins of the universe and the nature of its fundamental laws remains one of the most profound and challenging endeavors in science. Theories such as the evolving laws of physics, while not yet proven, offer intriguing possibilities and challenge us to reconsider our assumptions about the universe and our place within it. As we continue to explore the mysteries of the cosmos, the legacy of Hawking and Hertog's work serves as a reminder of the power of curiosity and the potential for new discoveries to reshape our understanding of the universe and our existence within it.









