Ways to keep talking — and maybe find way forward — amid riven times
Julia Minson’s new book says starting point involves signaling goodwill, respect, highlighting shared interests

In an era marked by increasing polarization and strained communication, Julia Minson's new book, "How To Disagree Better," offers a roadmap for fostering dialogue and potentially bridging divides. Drawing on years of research in public policy and communication, Minson's work highlights the importance of signaling goodwill, respect, and shared interests as the foundation for productive conversations.
Minson's research, which involved analyzing conversational language, led to the development of an algorithm that identified key words and phrases that influence perceptions of receptiveness. The findings not only revealed which elements were most impactful but also provided insights into which features could be prioritized or even ignored, as they were rarely used in natural conversation.
To help people internalize the most important features of conversational receptiveness, Minson's students devised an acronym: H.E.A.R., standing for "I HEAR you." This simple mnemonic device condenses years of research into a concise, actionable framework.
The first letter in the acronym, "H," stands for "Hedging your claims." Hedging serves as a crucial tool for demonstrating that even when you believe in the validity of your arguments, you acknowledge the existence of exceptions and the complexity of most issues. By using hedging words such as "sometimes," "perhaps," "possibly," "most," and "some," you signal to your counterpart that you are open to nuance and understanding.
For example, instead of asserting, "Women are better at multitasking," one might hedge their claim by saying, "While most studies suggest that women are generally better at multitasking, there are exceptions, and individual abilities can vary greatly." This approach not only acknowledges the complexity of the issue but also invites the other person to engage in a more thoughtful conversation.
The second letter in the acronym, "E," represents "Expressing empathy." By demonstrating empathy, individuals can create a more welcoming environment for discussion. This involves acknowledging the other person's perspective and emotions, which can help to de-escalate tensions and foster mutual respect.
The third letter, "A," stands for "Affirming shared interests." Highlighting common ground can serve as a powerful tool for bridging divides. When people recognize that they share values or goals, it becomes easier to find common ground and engage in constructive dialogue.
Finally, the last letter, "R," signifies "Respecting differences." Acknowledging and respecting the other person's viewpoint, even when it differs from your own, is essential for maintaining a productive conversation. This involves listening actively, avoiding dismissive language, and striving to understand the underlying reasoning behind the other person's arguments.
Minson's book emphasizes that these strategies are not just theoretical; they are practical tools that can be applied in everyday interactions. By adopting these approaches, individuals can transform contentious exchanges into opportunities for connection and mutual understanding.
In a time when divisions seem to be deepening, "How To Disagree Better" offers a beacon of hope. By prioritizing goodwill, respect, and shared interests, we can rebuild the bridges that have been broken and work toward a more harmonious future. As Minson's research shows, the art of disagreeing better is not only possible but also within our grasp.










