Neighbours' fury as 'unneighbourly and overbearing' newbuild six-bed mansion still has not been demolished despite homeowner being ordered to get rid of it TWICE
Locals say Yasmin Akhtar's 'eyesore' property in High Wycombe blocks all the light from their gardens and is out of keeping with the rest of the area.

Residents of High Wycombe are seething with frustration as the controversial six-bed mansion, dubbed an "eyesore" by many, continues to stand despite being ordered for demolition twice. The property, owned by Yasmin Akhtar, has become a focal point of community anger, with neighbours describing it as "unneighbourly and overbearing."
The mansion, which has been described as out of keeping with the surrounding area, has been a source of contention since its construction. Locals argue that the structure blocks sunlight from their gardens, disrupting their daily lives and diminishing the appeal of their own homes. The imposing presence of the building has also been criticized for not blending in with the existing architecture, further exacerbating tensions.
The first demolition order was issued in 2021, following a lengthy legal battle between the homeowner and local authorities. Despite the ruling, the mansion remained, prompting further legal action. In 2022, a second, more stringent demolition order was issued, this time with strict deadlines and penalties for non-compliance. However, despite these measures, the property has yet to be dismantled, leaving residents feeling powerless and frustrated.
Neighbors have expressed their concerns through numerous meetings and petitions, but their efforts have not yielded the desired outcome. Many feel that the legal process is flawed, allowing the homeowner to exploit loopholes and delay the inevitable. The situation has become a symbol of the struggle between individual property rights and community well-being, with residents demanding action to resolve the issue.
Local council officials have acknowledged the concerns and have assured the community that they are monitoring the situation closely. They have emphasized that the demolition orders are legally binding and that penalties will be enforced if the homeowner fails to comply. However, residents remain skeptical, fearing that the process will drag on indefinitely.
The case has also drawn attention to the broader issue of property development in the area. Critics argue that the planning permissions process is inadequate, allowing such large and disruptive structures to be built in residential neighborhoods. They call for stricter regulations and a greater emphasis on community input to prevent similar situations from arising in the future.
As the situation continues to escalate, residents of High Wycombe are left to grapple with the ongoing impact of the unfinished mansion. The stalemate has created a sense of division within the community, with some feeling that their voices are being ignored. The future of the property remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the residents will not rest until justice is served and their gardens are once again bathed in sunlight.










