Indianapolis councilman says shots fired at his house and a 'no data centers' note left on his doorstep
A city commission voted last week to allow rezoning for the data center in council member Ron Gibson's district. He has publicly backed the project.

On Monday evening, Indianapolis Councilman Ron Gibson's home on the city's northeast side was targeted by gunfire. The incident occurred shortly after a city council vote last week that approved rezoning for a data center project in Gibson's district. Gibson, who has publicly supported the project, found a note on his doorstep bearing the message "no data centers."
Neighbors reported hearing the gunshots around 8:30 p.m., and police responded to the scene. Initial investigations indicated that the shots were likely fired from a vehicle passing by, as no bullet casings were found near the residence. No one was injured in the incident, and Gibson and his family were not home at the time.
The data center project, which has been a point of contention in the district, was approved by the city council in a 7-2 vote. The rezoning allows for the construction of a large-scale data center, expected to generate significant economic benefits for the area, including job opportunities and increased tax revenue. Gibson, who represents the district, has been a vocal advocate for the project, arguing that it will help spur economic growth and address the city's infrastructure needs.
The note left on Gibson's doorstep, with its stark message, suggests that the incident may be linked to opposition against the data center. Some residents in the area have expressed concerns about potential environmental impacts, increased traffic, and changes to the character of the neighborhood. Critics of the project have organized protests and petitions, urging the council to reconsider its decision.
Indianapolis Police Department (IPD) is treating the shooting as a potential threat against Gibson and is investigating the incident closely. Detectives are reviewing security camera footage from the area and interviewing witnesses. The department has not yet determined if the shooting was a random act or if it was specifically targeting Gibson due to his role in supporting the data center project.
In a statement, Gibson expressed concern for his family's safety and called for dialogue to address the community's concerns. "I believe in the importance of this project for our district, but I also value the safety and well-being of everyone here," he said. "We must find a way to work together to ensure that our community remains a place where progress and peace can coexist."
The incident has sparked renewed debate over the data center project. Supporters argue that the economic benefits outweigh any short-term disruptions, while opponents maintain that the potential risks to the community's quality of life are too great. The city council is scheduled to hold a public hearing next week to address concerns and gather additional input from residents.
As the investigation into the shooting continues, the community remains on edge. Residents have organized neighborhood watch programs and have called for increased police presence in the area. Meanwhile, Gibson has received an outpouring of support from colleagues and constituents, who have rallied behind him in the face of this unsettling event.
The case serves as a stark reminder of the tensions that can arise in communities when major development projects are on the table. While the data center project holds the promise of economic growth, it also highlights the need for careful consideration of the potential impacts on local residents and the environment. As the investigation unfolds, the focus will be on ensuring the safety of all involved and finding a path forward that balances progress with community well-being.










