How to revive science in America

In the March 2026 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Volume 123, Issue 13, a group of leading scientists and policymakers outlined a comprehensive plan to revive science in America. The report, titled "Reinvigorating America's Scientific Enterprise," addresses the decline in scientific research and innovation that has been observed in recent years. The authors argue that urgent action is needed to restore America's position as a global leader in scientific discovery and technological advancement.

The decline in America's scientific prowess has been attributed to several factors, including reduced federal funding for research, a shortage of skilled scientists and engineers, and a lack of public interest in science. The report highlights the need for increased investment in science education at all levels, from elementary school through graduate programs. It emphasizes the importance of fostering a culture of curiosity and critical thinking among students, which can lead to a more informed and engaged citizenry.

One of the key recommendations in the report is to increase federal funding for scientific research. The authors propose a gradual increase in the federal budget for science and technology, aiming to reach a level comparable to that of other leading nations. This would help support not only basic research but also the development of new technologies and their commercialization. The report also stresses the need for a more efficient allocation of funds, ensuring that resources are directed toward high-impact projects with the potential for significant societal benefits.

Another critical issue addressed in the report is the shortage of skilled scientists and engineers. The authors call for a concerted effort to attract and retain top talent in the United States. This includes improving working conditions and job prospects for scientists, as well as enhancing the recruitment of international researchers. Additionally, the report suggests that partnerships between academia and industry could help bridge the gap between research and real-world applications, providing valuable opportunities for young scientists.

The report also underscores the importance of public engagement in science. It argues that a greater understanding of scientific principles among the general public can lead to more informed decision-making and increased support for scientific research. To achieve this, the authors recommend a multi-faceted approach that includes science communication campaigns, public forums, and collaborations with media outlets. They also propose the establishment of a national science communication office to coordinate these efforts and ensure a consistent message about the importance of science.

Furthermore, the report highlights the need for a more flexible and adaptable research ecosystem. It advocates for the creation of interdisciplinary research centers that can foster collaboration among scientists from different fields. This approach can lead to breakthroughs in areas where traditional boundaries between disciplines are blurred, such as biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and climate science. The report also emphasizes the importance of supporting early-career researchers, providing them with the resources and mentorship necessary to thrive in their work.

In conclusion, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences report outlines a roadmap for reviving science in America. By increasing funding, addressing the talent shortage, promoting public engagement, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, the United States can reclaim its position as a global leader in scientific research and innovation. The success of this plan will depend on the commitment of policymakers, scientists, and the broader public to work together toward a shared vision of a scientifically informed and prosperous future.