Fact-checkers reached more people in 2025. That didn’t help their finances
When VERA Files lost funding last year, the Manila-based newsroom had no choice but to overhaul its staffing plans. Five reporters left by the end of the year, and nobody […] The post Fact-checkers reached more people in 2025. That didn’t help their finances appeared first on Poynter .

In 2025, fact-checking organizations faced a unique challenge: reaching more people than ever before, yet struggling to maintain financial stability. VERA Files, a Manila-based newsroom known for its rigorous fact-checking, exemplified this dilemma. Last year, the organization lost funding, forcing it to restructure its staffing plans and ultimately leading to the departure of five reporters by year's end.
VERA Files' journey highlights the growing demand for fact-checking services in an era of misinformation. As social media platforms and digital news outlets proliferated, the need for independent verification of information became more critical. Organizations like VERA Files stepped up their efforts, expanding their reach to inform millions about the accuracy of news and public statements. However, despite this increased visibility, the financial challenges persisted.
The loss of funding for VERA Files was not an isolated incident. Many fact-checking organizations worldwide faced similar struggles. Traditional media outlets, which had historically supported fact-checking initiatives, were themselves grappling with declining revenues and shifting priorities. Online platforms, while crucial in amplifying fact-checkers' reach, often prioritized sensational content over nuanced, verified information. This created a challenging environment for fact-checking organizations to secure sufficient funding to sustain their operations.
VERA Files' decision to overhaul its staffing plans was a direct response to these financial constraints. The organization had to make tough choices, leading to the departure of experienced reporters. This loss of talent not only impacted the quality of their work but also raised concerns about the long-term viability of fact-checking in the region.
Despite these challenges, VERA Files and other fact-checking organizations continued to innovate. They explored alternative funding sources, such as grants, donations, and partnerships with international organizations. Some even ventured into new areas, like digital literacy programs and public education campaigns, to diversify their income streams.
The story of VERA Files and similar fact-checking organizations in 2025 underscores the importance of supporting independent fact-checking. As misinformation continues to spread, the role of fact-checkers in safeguarding public trust in information becomes more vital. However, to ensure their sustainability, it is crucial to address the financial challenges they face and promote a culture that values accurate information over sensationalism.
In conclusion, the year 2025 saw fact-checking organizations reach unprecedented levels of audience engagement. Yet, this growth did not translate into financial stability for many, including VERA Files. The departure of reporters and the need for staffing overhauls highlighted the urgent need for sustainable funding models and a renewed commitment to supporting fact-checking initiatives. Only through collective action can the integrity of information be preserved in an increasingly complex media landscape.










