Ben Roberts-Smith arrested: former Australian soldier charged with five war crime murders in Afghanistan
Roberts-Smith previously failed in his attempt to sue three newspapers which published allegations he murdered unarmed civilians and bullied comrades Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast Australia’s most decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, has been arrested at Sydney airport and charged with war crimes. The Australian federal police and the Office of the Special Investigator announced details of the investigation in Sydney on Tuesday after midday. Continue reading...

Australia’s most decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, has been arrested at Sydney Airport and charged with war crimes. The Australian Federal Police and the Office of the Special Investigator announced details of the investigation in Sydney on Tuesday after midday. Roberts-Smith, a former commanding officer of the elite 2nd Commando Regiment, is facing charges related to five murders allegedly committed in Afghanistan during his time in the military.
The arrest comes after a prolonged investigation that began in 2019, when three Australian newspapers published allegations that Roberts-Smith had murdered unarmed civilians and bullied comrades. The soldier had attempted to sue the newspapers for defamation, but his case was ultimately dismissed by the Supreme Court of New South Wales in 2021. The court ruled that the journalists had reasonable grounds for their reporting, based on evidence from military investigations and interviews with former colleagues.
The charges against Roberts-Smith include five counts of murder, related to the deaths of Afghan civilians in the Helmand Province in 2012. The allegations detail incidents where the victims were killed while unarmed and posing no threat to Australian forces. Prosecutors argue that Roberts-Smith, as a senior officer, bore a duty to ensure that his troops adhered to the laws of war, and that he failed in this responsibility.
The investigation was conducted jointly by the Australian Federal Police and the Office of the Special Investigator, an independent body established to prosecute war crimes and other serious offenses. The charges mark the first time an Australian soldier has been prosecuted for war crimes in the country’s history. The case has drawn significant attention both domestically and internationally, highlighting the complexities of military operations and the need for accountability in wartime.
Roberts-Smith, who has been a prominent figure in Australia’s military since his return from Afghanistan in 2013, has not yet appeared in court. His arrest was made quietly at Sydney Airport, with no fanfare or public display, in contrast to his previous high-profile appearances. Legal representatives for Roberts-Smith have stated that he is innocent and that the charges against him are without merit.
The case has sparked a national debate about the role of the military, the conduct of war, and the need for transparency in investigations involving high-ranking officials. Critics argue that the lengthy delay in charging Roberts-Smith raises questions about the independence and effectiveness of the legal system in handling such sensitive cases. Supporters of the investigation maintain that the process has been thorough and necessary to ensure justice for the victims and their families.
The trial of Ben Roberts-Smith is expected to be a landmark event in Australian legal history. If found guilty, he could face life imprisonment, marking a significant departure from the country’s previous approach to prosecuting war crimes. The case also underscores the challenges faced by military personnel in balancing the demands of duty with the ethical obligations to uphold the rule of law.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the nation watches closely, grappling with the implications of holding its most decorated soldier accountable for alleged war crimes. The case serves as a stark reminder of the complexities of military engagement and the importance of holding those in command responsible for the actions of their subordinates. The outcome will undoubtedly shape Australia’s approach to war crimes and the treatment of its military personnel in the years to come.









